Vladimir Ivanov vs Hao Wu Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W W L W
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Ivanov 1 - 0 Wu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ivanov winning 2 and Wu winning 0. The last match between Ivanov and Wu was at the M15 Nanchang, 27-09-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Vladimir Ivanov getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vladimir Ivanov | 1 |
| Hao Wu | 0 |
M15 Nanchang(27-09-2019)
6
2
7
6
| Ivanov | Stats | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 310 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 38 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (359-274) | Career Total W/L | 59% (88-62) |
| $2,580 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Hao Wu
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:45:0 | Average Match Time | 1:45:0 |
| 62% (41/66) | 1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (27/38) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 40% (24/60) | Return Points Win % | 33% (22/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vladimir Ivanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Iiro Vasa
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
4
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
33 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
16 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Tom Gentzsch
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
4
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Michal Mikula
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Arvid Nordquist
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
3-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
100)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hao Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Hao Wu
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
12
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chuhan Wang
Player
Hao Wu
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hao Wu
Player
Shohei Chikami
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Hao Wu
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hao Wu
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hao Wu
Player
Linang Xiao
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusty H. Boyer
Player
Hao Wu
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hao Wu
Player
Chuhan Wang
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (359/274) | Win/Loss | 59% (88/62) |
| 54% (802/677) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (190/150) |
| 52% (7234/6704) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1659/1470) |
| 42% (28/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) |
| 60% (229/151) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (29/21) |
| 55% (102/85) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1272 | Aces Total | 297 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 847 | Total Double Faults | 255 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 597.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.88 |
| 59% (12625/21428) | 1st Serve % | 62% (3248/5244) |
| 70% (8808/12625) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2158/3248) |
| 49% (4284/8814) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (957/1996) |
| 44% (962/2170) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (207/475) |
| 41% (8902/21931) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2018/5195) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (8/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (35/38) | Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 58% (314/226) | Futures W/L | 61% (81/52) |
| 57% (351/618) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (84/142) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (90/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (18/39) |
| 59% (121/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 86% (343/294) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (83/72) |
| 14% (343/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (83/11) |
| 22% (290/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (66/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
